comet: be observed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.73
, celestial object
Weight: 0.70
, planet
Weight: 0.61
, solar system
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pluto
Weight: 0.50
, meteor
Weight: 0.39
, galaxy
Weight: 0.39
, asteroid
Weight: 0.38
, quasar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be observed 1.00
have observed showers 0.78
have observed together showers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(meteor, have observed showers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meteor, have observed together showers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(meteor, have observed showers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(meteor, have observed showers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(meteor, have observed together showers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(meteor, have observed together showers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(comet, be observed)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(comet, have observed together showers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(comet, have observed together showers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(comet, have observed together showers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(comet, have observed together showers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(comet, be observed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(comet, be observed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(meteor, have observed showers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(comet, be observed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(meteor, have observed together showers)