commander: has quality use

Related concepts

Parents	officer Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.61 , person Weight: 0.60 , general Weight: 0.57
Siblings	commodore Weight: 0.48 , police officer Weight: 0.38 , lieutenant Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality use	1.00
has quality good	0.88
has quality bad	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(officer, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(commander, has quality use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(officer, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(officer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(officer, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(commander, has quality use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(commander, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(commander, has quality good)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(commander, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(commander, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(commander, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(commander, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(commander, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(commander, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(commander, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(commander, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(commander, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(officer, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(commander, has quality use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(officer, has quality bad)