commercial: is loud

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents production
Weight: 0.66
, land
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, national park
Weight: 0.32
, property
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is loud 2018 1.00
is loud 1.00
get loud 0.97
is loud again 0.94
is god loud 0.88
be on internet loud 0.88
is ridiculously loud 0.87
be on tv loud 0.86
be loud on roku 0.86
be on internet damn loud 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(commercial, is loud)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(commercial, get loud)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(commercial, get loud)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(commercial, get loud)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(commercial, be loud on roku)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(commercial, be loud on roku)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(commercial, be loud on roku)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(commercial, get loud)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be on tv loud)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be loud on roku)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(commercial, is loud)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(commercial, is loud) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(commercial, is loud)