commercial: is louder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents production
Weight: 0.66
, land
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, advertisement
Weight: 0.61
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.36
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, national park
Weight: 0.32
, property
Weight: 0.32
, crown land
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is louder 1.00
be louder than show 0.95
get again louder 0.95
be louder than program 0.93
be louder than programs 0.91
be louder on tv 0.91
be louder than programming 0.89
be louder than actual show 0.89
be louder than tv show 0.89
be much louder than tv shows 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(advertisement, is louder)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, is louder)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(advertisement, is louder)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(advertisement, is louder)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(advertisement, is louder)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(commercial, is louder)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(commercial, is louder)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than show)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than program)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(commercial, get again louder)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder on tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(commercial, get again louder)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than show)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than show)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(commercial, get again louder)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(commercial, be louder than actual show)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than program)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(commercial, be louder than actual show)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than actual show)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than program)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(commercial, be louder than programs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be much louder than tv shows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(commercial, get again louder)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than actual show)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than show)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than program)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(commercial, be louder than programs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commercial, is louder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(commercial, is louder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(advertisement, is louder)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(commercial, is louder)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(advertisement, is louder)