commission: is taxed more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.78
, city
Weight: 0.66
, proposal
Weight: 0.65
, county
Weight: 0.64
, commissioner
Weight: 0.62
Siblings council
Weight: 0.39
, board
Weight: 0.36
, senate
Weight: 0.35
, county court
Weight: 0.35
, authority
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is taxed more 1.00
get taxed more 0.99
is taxed 0.98
be taxed at 40 0.97
get taxed 0.97
is taxed higher 0.95
is taxed high 0.95
be taxed at rate 0.94
be taxed at higher rate 0.92
get taxed differently 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed more)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed higher)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed more)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed more)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed higher)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed higher)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed differently)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed high)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed more)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(commission, get taxed differently)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(commission, is taxed high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at higher rate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed differently)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed differently)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(commission, is taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed more)