common law: be important in today 's system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.77
, rule
Weight: 0.69
, authority
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.62
, immunity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prohibition
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.35
, code
Weight: 0.34
, norm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in today 's system 1.00
be important today 0.90
be important in today 's judicial system 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(common law, be important in today 's system)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(common law, be important today)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(common law, be important today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common law, be important today)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(common law, be important in today 's judicial system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(common law, be important in today 's judicial system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(common law, be important in today 's judicial system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(common law, be important today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, be important in today 's judicial system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(common law, be important in today 's system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(common law, be important in today 's system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(common law, be important in today 's system)