common sense: was popular during 1700s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.71
, thing
Weight: 0.68
, belief
Weight: 0.66
, sense
Weight: 0.63
Siblings characteristic
Weight: 0.36
, empathy
Weight: 0.35
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular during 1700s 1.00
was popular 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(common sense, was popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)