communication: be in organization important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in organization important 1.00
be important in organization 1.00
be in organization 0.96
be essential in organization 0.94
be important within organization 0.93
be life of organization 0.91
be known as lifeblood of organization 0.82
be lifeblood of business organization 0.81
be important in team 0.81
be achieved in line type of organization 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be achieved in line type of organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(coordination, be achieved in line type of organization)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(coordination, be achieved in line type of organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(communication, be in organization important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communication, be important in organization)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(communication, be important in organization)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in organization)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important within organization)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(communication, be important within organization)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(communication, be important within organization)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in organization)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(communication, be lifeblood of business organization)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important within organization)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, be lifeblood of business organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be lifeblood of business organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be lifeblood of business organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be in organization important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be in organization important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(coordination, be achieved in line type of organization)