communication: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be called process 0.87
be considered process 0.85
be considered as process 0.85
be considered as multi-dimensional process 0.85
has physical part systems 0.85
be important process of learning 0.85
be considered in two way process 0.84
be thought of of process 0.82
be thought as as process 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(failure, be important process of learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(communication, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(communication, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(communication, be considered process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(failure, be important process of learning)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(communication, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(failure, be important process of learning)