communication: is vital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vital 1.00
is essential 0.89
be vital to success 0.88
be important in organisation 0.85
be important in georgraphy 0.85
be vital to success of business 0.85
be important for tcrm 0.84
be crucial in science 0.84
have vital in physical activity time 0.84
be essential in organization 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communication, is vital)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(communication, is vital)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(coordination, have vital in physical activity time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(communication, is vital)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, is essential)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(communication, is essential)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(communication, is essential)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(communication, is essential)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communication, is vital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(communication, is vital) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)