communication: represent function of human language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
represent function of human language 1.00
represent function of language 0.97
represent function 0.90
is language 0.80
be important in human georgraphy 0.80
is human 0.79
be important in human life 0.78
relates to language 0.78
be important in human geography 0.77
be considered human activity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(communication, represent function of human language)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(communication, relates to language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(communication, relates to language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, be considered human activity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered human activity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(communication, relates to language)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(communication, be considered human activity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(communication, relates to language)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(communication, be important in human life)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, represent function of human language)