community: be based disaster management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents village
Weight: 0.69
, show
Weight: 0.63
, channel
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings town
Weight: 0.69
, university
Weight: 0.67
, other people
Weight: 0.67
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.66
, south park
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be based disaster management 1.00
need disaster plans 0.83
be based development successful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(community, be based disaster management)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(community, need disaster plans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(community, need disaster plans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(community, need disaster plans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(community, be based development successful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(community, be based development successful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(community, be based development successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(community, need disaster plans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(community, be based development successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(community, be based disaster management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(community, be based disaster management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(community, be based disaster management)