community: were similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents village
Weight: 0.69
, show
Weight: 0.63
, channel
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings town
Weight: 0.69
, university
Weight: 0.67
, other people
Weight: 0.67
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.66
, south park
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
were similar 1.00
be similar 0.94
is different 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(channel, be similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(community, were similar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(village, be similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(community, were similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(village, be similar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(channel, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(channel, be similar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(village, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(channel, be similar)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(community, were similar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(village, be similar)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(community, were similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(community, were similar)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(community, be similar)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(community, be similar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(community, be similar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(community, be similar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(community, is different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(community, is different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(community, is different)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(community, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(community, were similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(community, were similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(village, be similar)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(channel, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(village, be similar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(community, were similar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(channel, be similar)