company: be at big city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.66
, market
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.62
, operator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.87
, department store
Weight: 0.68
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.65
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.63
, shop
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at big city 1.00
be big 0.88
be at any large city 0.87
be at city 0.87
requires go to big department store 0.81
be at town 0.78
be at downtown area 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(market, be at city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(market, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(market, be at city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(market, be at town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(shop, be at downtown area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shop, be at town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at big city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, be big)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shop, requires go to big department store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(market, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at big city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(market, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(department store, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(department store, be at big city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, be big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(department store, be big)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(shop, requires go to big department store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(shop, requires go to big department store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(department store, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(department store, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shop, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(shop, be at town)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(shop, be at downtown area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(shop, be at downtown area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(company, be at big city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(company, be at any large city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(company, be at city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(company, be at town)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(company, be at any large city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(company, be at city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(company, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(company, be at any large city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(company, be at any large city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(company, be at city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(company, be at town)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(company, be at town)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(company, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(company, be at big city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(department store, be at city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(department store, be at big city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shop, requires go to big department store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(shop, be at town)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(department store, be big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shop, be at downtown area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(market, be at city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(company, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(market, be at town)