company: go out of business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oil company
Weight: 0.70
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.68
, law firm
Weight: 0.68
, operator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.87
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.70
, conglomerate
Weight: 0.68
, department store
Weight: 0.68
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
go out of business 1.00
go into business 0.95
do business 0.90
be in business 0.88
go into international business 0.87
stay in business 0.87
keep in business 0.86
be better form of business 0.81
have go 0.80
go pagano 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(department store, go out of business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(department store, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(department store, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(company, go out of business)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(company, do business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(company, go into business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, keep in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(company, be in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(company, do business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(company, go into business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(company, keep in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(company, go into business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(company, be better form of business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(company, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(company, do business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(company, keep in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(company, go into business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(company, be better form of business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, do business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(company, be better form of business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, keep in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(company, be better form of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(department store, go out of business)