comparison: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	estimate Weight: 0.60 , detail Weight: 0.58 , reference Weight: 0.57 , picture Weight: 0.55
Siblings	figure Weight: 0.32 , picture frame Weight: 0.31 , projection Weight: 0.31 , explanation Weight: 0.31 , assumption Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality wrong	0.87
has quality worth	0.82
look bad	0.79
has quality sin	0.76
has quality questions	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(comparison, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(reference, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(comparison, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(picture, look bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(comparison, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(picture, look bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(reference, has quality questions)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(picture, look bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(picture frame, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(assumption, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(assumption, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(assumption, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(projection, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(projection, has quality sin)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(picture frame, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(comparison, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(picture, look bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(comparison, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(reference, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(comparison, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(projection, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(assumption, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(assumption, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(assumption, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(assumption, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(picture frame, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(picture frame, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(assumption, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(assumption, has quality wrong)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(picture frame, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(picture frame, has quality worth)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(projection, has quality sin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(projection, has quality sin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(comparison, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(comparison, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(reference, has quality questions)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(picture, look bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(assumption, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(picture frame, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(assumption, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(projection, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(assumption, has quality wrong)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(picture frame, has quality worth)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(projection, has quality sin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(reference, has quality questions)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(comparison, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(picture, look bad)