comparison: is effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.58
, reference
Weight: 0.57
, picture
Weight: 0.55
Siblings figure
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.31
, projection
Weight: 0.31
, explanation
Weight: 0.31
, assumption
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective 1.00
be critical to effective project 0.82
be critical to effective project management 0.79
tell effective story 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(comparison, is effective)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(comparison, is effective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(figure, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(comparison, is effective)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(comparison, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(figure, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(figure, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(comparison, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(comparison, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(figure, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(comparison, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project management)