competition: be among businesses rare

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be among businesses rare 1.00
be good for businesses 0.84
be between businesses good 0.84
be good for companies 0.78
be in business considered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(competition, be among businesses rare)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(competition, be between businesses good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(competition, be in business considered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(competition, be between businesses good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(competition, be good for businesses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(competition, be between businesses good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for businesses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(competition, be in business considered)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(competition, be in business considered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(competition, be between businesses good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for businesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(competition, be good for businesses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in business considered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(competition, be among businesses rare)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(competition, be among businesses rare)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(competition, be among businesses rare)