competition: be bad for consumers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for consumers 1.00
be good for consumers 0.98
be important to consumers 0.95
help consumers 0.94
affect consumers 0.94
benefit consumers 0.91
be good for companies 0.79
be good for businesses 0.78
be bad for economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(competition, be important to consumers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(competition, help consumers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(competition, be important to consumers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(competition, be important to consumers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(competition, help consumers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(competition, be good for consumers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(competition, help consumers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(competition, be good for consumers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for consumers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for consumers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(competition, help consumers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(competition, be important to consumers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for businesses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(competition, be good for businesses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(competition, be good for businesses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)