competition: be good for buisinesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for buisinesses 1.00
has quality good 0.85
be good in life 0.85
is good thing 0.85
be bad 0.85
be in business good 0.84
make us better 0.82
be good for society 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
be good for businesses 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(auction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(auction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(auction, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(competition, be bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(competition, make us better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(competition, be bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(competition, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(competition, make us better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(competition, make us better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, be good for society)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(competition, be bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(competition, be good for businesses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(competition, be good for society)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(competition, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(competition, be bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(competition, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(competition, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for businesses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(competition, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(competition, make us better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for businesses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(competition, be good for businesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(competition, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(auction, has quality good)