competitor: master event

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.58
, advantage
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, other person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings player
Weight: 0.69
, target
Weight: 0.62
, supplier
Weight: 0.60
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
master event 1.00
master video game 0.81
be at sport event 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(player, master video game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(player, be at sport event)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(player, master video game)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(player, master video game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(player, be at sport event)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(player, be at sport event)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competitor, master event)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(competitor, be at sport event)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitor, be at sport event)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(competitor, master event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(player, be at sport event)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(player, master video game)