competitors: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
be important to business 0.92
affect business 0.85
be interested in business 0.83
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(competitors, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(competitors, be important to business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(competitors, be important for business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(competitors, be important to business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(competitors, affect business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(competitors, affect business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(competitors, be interested in business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(competitors, be interested in business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(competitors, be important for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(competitors, be important to business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(competitors, be important for business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be important for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(competitors, affect business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(competitors, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(competitors, be interested in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(competitors, affect business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(competitors, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be interested in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(competitors, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competitors, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competitors, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(competitors, be good for business)