competitors: be located in area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located in area 1.00
be located in same area 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(competitors, be located in area)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(competitors, be located in same area)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be located in same area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(competitors, be located in same area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(competitors, be located in same area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be located in area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(competitors, be located in area)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(competitors, be located in area)