competitors: eat tilapia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat tilapia 1.00
eat asparagus 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(competitors, eat tilapia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(competitors, eat asparagus)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(competitors, eat asparagus)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat asparagus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(competitors, eat asparagus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(competitors, eat tilapia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(competitors, eat tilapia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat tilapia)