competitors: use statements

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
use statements 1.00
need statements 0.97
use financial statements 0.93
need financial statements 0.90
be interested in statements 0.89
be interested in financial statements 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(competitors, use statements)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(competitors, need statements)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(competitors, use financial statements)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitors, need statements)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(competitors, use financial statements)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(competitors, need financial statements)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(competitors, need financial statements)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be interested in statements)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(competitors, be interested in statements)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(competitors, be interested in financial statements)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(competitors, be interested in financial statements)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(competitors, use financial statements)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(competitors, need statements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(competitors, use financial statements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(competitors, need statements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(competitors, need financial statements)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(competitors, be interested in statements)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(competitors, be interested in statements)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(competitors, need financial statements)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(competitors, be interested in financial statements)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(competitors, be interested in financial statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(competitors, use statements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(competitors, use statements)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(competitors, use statements)