competitors: were rewarded in games

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
were rewarded in games 1.00
were rewarded in greek games 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competitors, were rewarded in games)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(competitors, were rewarded in greek games)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(competitors, were rewarded in greek games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(competitors, were rewarded in greek games)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(competitors, were rewarded in greek games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(competitors, were rewarded in games)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(competitors, were rewarded in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitors, were rewarded in games)