complaint: be important to organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents letter
Weight: 0.65
, evidence
Weight: 0.64
, meeting
Weight: 0.60
, email
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.70
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.63
, headache
Weight: 0.62
, argument
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organisation 1.00
be important to business 0.82
be important in healthcare 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(email, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(letter, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(email, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(email, be important to business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(email, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(letter, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(complaint, be important to organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(complaint, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(complaint, be important in healthcare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(complaint, be important in healthcare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important in healthcare)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important in healthcare)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(email, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(letter, be important to business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(email, be important to business)