complement: has state rule

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.53
, immune response
Weight: 0.52
, product
Weight: 0.51
, group
Weight: 0.49
Siblings compliment
Weight: 0.50
, functional group
Weight: 0.30
, integration
Weight: 0.30
, platform
Weight: 0.30
, dairy product
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state rule 1.00
be through substitution related to chain rule 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, has state rule)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dairy product, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dairy product, has state rule)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(complement, has state rule)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(complement, has state rule)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(complement, has state rule)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dairy product, has state rule)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(complement, has state rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(integration, be through substitution related to chain rule)