complex: is horrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compound
Weight: 0.58
, hebrews
Weight: 0.40
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, parking structure
Weight: 0.33
, historical site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is horrible 1.00
is pathetic 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(complex, is horrible)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(complex, is pathetic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(complex, is pathetic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complex, is pathetic)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(complex, is pathetic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(complex, is horrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(complex, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complex, is horrible)