compliance: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents documentation
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
Siblings transparency
Weight: 0.32
, compatibility
Weight: 0.32
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, attestation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality difference 0.80
is good thing 0.78
be good thing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(compliance, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(compliance, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be good thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(transparency, is good thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(transparency, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(compliance, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(compliance, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(transparency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(transparency, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(integration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(transparency, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(transparency, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(transparency, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(transparency, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(transparency, be good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(transparency, be good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(integration, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(compliance, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(compliance, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality worth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(transparency, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(transparency, be good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(transparency, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(integration, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(integration, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(compliance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)