compliment: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents way
Weight: 0.54
, complaint
Weight: 0.50
, complement
Weight: 0.50
, description
Weight: 0.49
Siblings twink
Weight: 0.36
, answer
Weight: 0.30
, well
Weight: 0.30
, form
Weight: 0.30
, fact
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
become in relationship 0.94
find important in labor relations 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fact, find important in labor relations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fact, find important in labor relations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fact, find important in labor relations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(compliment, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(compliment, become in relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(compliment, become in relationship)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(compliment, become in relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(compliment, become in relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(compliment, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(compliment, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(compliment, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fact, find important in labor relations)