compliment: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents way
Weight: 0.54
, complaint
Weight: 0.50
, complement
Weight: 0.50
, description
Weight: 0.49
Siblings twink
Weight: 0.36
, answer
Weight: 0.30
, well
Weight: 0.30
, form
Weight: 0.30
, fact
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is difficult 0.82
feel really good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(compliment, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(compliment, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(compliment, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(compliment, feel really good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(compliment, feel really good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(compliment, feel really good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(compliment, feel really good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(compliment, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(compliment, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(compliment, is hard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)