compost: be better than fertilizer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, amendment
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, waste
Weight: 0.56
Siblings composting
Weight: 0.35
, manure
Weight: 0.35
, fertilizer
Weight: 0.34
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, human waste
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than fertilizer 1.00
be used as fertilizer 0.94
be better than chemical fertilizers 0.92
preferred for fertilizers 0.86
be better than compost 0.82
is added to soil by farmers 0.78
be better than coal 0.77
contain nitrogen 0.77
is added to soil in farm 0.76
be good for soil 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(waste, be better than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(waste, be better than coal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(waste, be better than coal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for soil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, is added to soil by farmers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be better than compost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(waste, be better than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(human waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fertilizer, be better than compost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be better than compost)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fertilizer, contain nitrogen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(manure, is added to soil in farm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be good for soil)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fertilizer, is added to soil by farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, is added to soil by farmers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for soil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(compost, be good for soil)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for soil)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(compost, be good for soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waste, be better than coal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be better than compost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for soil)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fertilizer, is added to soil by farmers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waste, be better than coal)