composting: be than burning leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than burning leaves 1.00
be than better burning leaves 0.98
be than leaves 0.87
be than better leaves 0.84
is burned 0.81
burn plants 0.79
burn many calories 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(waste, is burned)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(compost, burn plants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gardening, burn many calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(compost, burn plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(compost, burn plants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(waste, is burned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waste, is burned)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gardening, burn many calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(gardening, burn many calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(composting, be than burning leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(composting, be than better burning leaves)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than better burning leaves)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(composting, be than better burning leaves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(composting, be than leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(composting, be than better burning leaves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(composting, be than leaves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(composting, be than better leaves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(composting, be than better leaves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(composting, be than leaves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(composting, be than better leaves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than better leaves)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than leaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(composting, be than burning leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(compost, burn plants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(waste, is burned)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than burning leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gardening, burn many calories)