compression: be in music production work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
Siblings jitter
Weight: 0.34
, acceleration
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in music production work 1.00
work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(variable, work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(feature, work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(technology, work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(technology, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(feature, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(variable, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(feature, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(variable, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(technology, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(jitter, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acceleration, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(variable, work)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(feature, work)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(technology, work)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compression, be in music production work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(viscosity, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(viscosity, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(jitter, work)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(jitter, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(acceleration, work)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(acceleration, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(compression, be in music production work)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(compression, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(compression, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(compression, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(compression, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(compression, be in music production work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(technology, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(feature, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(variable, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(jitter, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(viscosity, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(acceleration, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(technology, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(feature, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(compression, be in music production work)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(variable, work)