compression: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
Siblings jitter
Weight: 0.34
, acceleration
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is efficient 0.97
is effective 0.79
make more power 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(compression, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(compression, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(compression, is effective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(compression, make more power)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(compression, is effective)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(compression, is effective)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(compression, make more power)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(compression, make more power)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(compression, make more power)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(compression, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compression, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(compression, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)