compromise: be in relationship work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.63
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
, provision
Weight: 0.59
, idea
Weight: 0.58
, marriage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, amendment
Weight: 0.34
, resolution
Weight: 0.34
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in relationship work 1.00
be important in relationship 0.95
be important part of relationship 0.94
be important trait in relationship 0.87
affect relationships 0.86
affect healthy relationships 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, be important part of relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(compromise, be in relationship work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(marriage, be important part of relationship)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(marriage, be important part of relationship)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(marriage, be important part of relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(compromise, be in relationship work)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(compromise, affect relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compromise, be important trait in relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important part of relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important in relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important in relationship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(compromise, affect relationships)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(compromise, affect healthy relationships)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(compromise, affect relationships)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important trait in relationship)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important trait in relationship)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(compromise, be important part of relationship)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(compromise, be important in relationship)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(compromise, affect relationships)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important part of relationship)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(compromise, affect healthy relationships)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(compromise, affect healthy relationships)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(compromise, affect healthy relationships)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(compromise, be important trait in relationship)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(compromise, be important part of relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(compromise, be in relationship work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(marriage, be important part of relationship)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(compromise, be in relationship work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(marriage, be important part of relationship)