computer hardware: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.84
, technology
Weight: 0.74
, electronics
Weight: 0.69
, software
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.68
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.85
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.70
, server
Weight: 0.69
, router
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(software, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(software, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(software, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(software, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer hardware, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer hardware, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(computer hardware, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(technology, be related)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(software, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(technology, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer hardware, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(software, be related)