computer mouse: be named after mice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.72
, computer
Weight: 0.70
, mouse
Weight: 0.68
, keyboard
Weight: 0.67
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.40
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, computer virus
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named after mice 1.00
be called mice 0.95
be named after actual mice 0.94
be named mouse 0.83
be called mouse 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, be called mice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mouse, be called mice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be called mice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, be called mice)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be called mice)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(computer mouse, be called mice)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be called mice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be named after actual mice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be called mouse)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be called mice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be named after actual mice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be named mouse)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be called mouse)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(computer mouse, be named after actual mice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(computer mouse, be called mouse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be named mouse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(computer mouse, be named mouse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after actual mice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be named mouse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be called mouse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mouse, be called mice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer mouse, be named after mice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mouse, be called mice)