computer network: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network
Weight: 0.83
, electronic device
Weight: 0.75
, computer
Weight: 0.71
Siblings computer virus
Weight: 0.79
, web site
Weight: 0.72
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.70
, printer
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality questions 0.92
has quality bad 0.76
is quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality question)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality question)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(printer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(printer, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(computer network, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(computer network, has quality questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(computer network, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(computer network, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality question)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)