computer science: be better than information science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than information science 1.00
be science 0.83
is science 0.82
be called computer science 0.80
relate to science 0.80
be considered science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(computer science, be better than information science)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, be called computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be called computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, be called computer science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(computer science, be science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, be called computer science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(computer science, relate to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(computer science, be considered science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)