computer science: be considered engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered engineering 1.00
be in engineering 0.96
be considered science 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(computer science, be considered engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(computer science, be in engineering)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(computer science, be in engineering)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be in engineering)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(computer science, be in engineering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(computer science, be considered science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered engineering)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)