computer science: require physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
require physics 1.00
need physics 0.95
be related with physics 0.91
compare to physics 0.86
require math 0.84
require calculus 0.79
be science 0.76
is science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(computer science, require physics)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, need physics)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need physics)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(computer science, be related with physics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be related with physics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer science, need physics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require calculus)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(computer science, require calculus)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, be related with physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(computer science, need physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, require calculus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(computer science, be related with physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(computer science, require calculus)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(computer science, be science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, is science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(computer science, require math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer science, require physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)