computer user: be at computer lab

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents user
Weight: 0.67
, information
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.50
, everyone
Weight: 0.50
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.81
, customer
Weight: 0.65
, computer database
Weight: 0.35
, computer file
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at computer lab 1.00
be at computer 0.87
be at computer store 0.86
requires have computer 0.83
use computer 0.83
be used to use computer 0.82
requires use computer 0.82
run on computer 0.80
write computer software 0.79
requires turn on computer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(program, be at computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(program, requires have computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, requires use computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(program, run on computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(program, requires turn on computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(user, use computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(user, use computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(program, be at computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(program, requires have computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(program, requires use computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(program, run on computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(program, requires turn on computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(program, run on computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(program, be at computer)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(program, requires turn on computer)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, requires have computer)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, requires use computer)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(user, use computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer programmer, write computer software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(program, be at computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(program, requires have computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, requires use computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(program, run on computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(user, use computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(program, requires turn on computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer programmer, write computer software)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(computer programmer, write computer software)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(computer user, be at computer lab)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer store)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(computer user, use computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer user, be used to use computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(computer user, be at computer store)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(computer user, use computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(computer user, be used to use computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer user, use computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be used to use computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer store)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(computer user, use computer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer user, be used to use computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, requires use computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(user, use computer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(program, requires have computer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(program, be at computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(program, requires turn on computer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, run on computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(computer programmer, write computer software)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, requires use computer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(user, use computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(program, requires have computer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(program, be at computer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(program, requires turn on computer)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(computer user, be at computer lab)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, run on computer)