computer user: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents user
Weight: 0.67
, information
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.50
, everyone
Weight: 0.50
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.81
, customer
Weight: 0.65
, computer database
Weight: 0.35
, computer file
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be at office 0.88
requires either buy or build computer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(program, requires either buy or build computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer user, be at office build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(program, requires either buy or build computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, requires either buy or build computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(program, requires either buy or build computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at office build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(computer user, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(computer user, be at office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at office)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(computer user, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer user, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(program, requires either buy or build computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(computer user, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(program, requires either buy or build computer)