computer virus: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.79
, computer
Weight: 0.78
, virus
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.64
Siblings trojan horse
Weight: 0.74
, worm
Weight: 0.66
, trojan
Weight: 0.62
, computer game
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality joke 0.80
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(security, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(security, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(security, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(worm, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(trojan, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(security, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(trojan, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trojan, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(worm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(worm, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(computer game, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality question)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality question)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality question)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(security, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(trojan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worm, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(security, has quality question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)