computer virus: has state viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.79
, computer
Weight: 0.78
, virus
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.64
Siblings trojan horse
Weight: 0.74
, worm
Weight: 0.66
, trojan
Weight: 0.62
, computer game
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state viruses 1.00
be like viruses 0.95
is call viruses 0.93
be called computer viruses 0.93
be like biological viruses 0.89
be malware 0.83
be appropriately called viruses 0.83
be malware created 0.83
actually infect files 0.78
be called trojans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(trojan, be called trojans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(trojan, be called trojans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(trojan, be called trojans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer virus, be malware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(computer virus, be malware)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(computer virus, be malware created)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(computer virus, be malware created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be malware)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be malware created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(computer virus, actually infect files)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(computer virus, be called trojans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(computer virus, actually infect files)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(computer virus, actually infect files)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(computer virus, be called trojans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be called trojans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, actually infect files)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be called trojans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be malware)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be malware created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trojan, be called trojans)