computer: be used in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, supercomputer
Weight: 0.75
, computer programming
Weight: 0.75
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in business 1.00
be used for business 0.99
be used in cim 0.82
be used in theatre 0.82
be used 0.80
be used in today 0.79
were used for use 0.78
be used today 0.78
is when used 0.78
be are used in money 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer, be used in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer, be used in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(computer, be used in business)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(computer, be used for business)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used for business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer, be used for business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer, be used for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(computer, be used in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(computer, be used in business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)