computer: be used to write

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.72
, computer network
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to write 1.00
be used to write book 0.92
be used to write text 0.86
be used to write letter 0.84
be used to write novel 0.82
be used to write email 0.81
write code 0.79
write computer software 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programmer, write code)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer programmer, write computer software)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(computer programmer, write code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(computer programmer, write code)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer programmer, write computer software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(computer programmer, write computer software)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(computer, be used to write)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write letter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(computer, be used to write letter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer, be used to write letter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(computer, be used to write letter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(computer, be used to write)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(computer programmer, write computer software)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be used to write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer programmer, write code)