computer: slow down with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
, network device
Weight: 0.68
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, supercomputer
Weight: 0.75
, computer programming
Weight: 0.75
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
slow down with age 1.00
slow down over time 0.91
is slow 0.84
run slow 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(computer, slow down with age)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, slow down over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(computer, run slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(computer, run slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer, is slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(computer, slow down over time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(computer, slow down over time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(computer, slow down over time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(computer, run slow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(computer, run slow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer, is slow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(computer, is slow)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(computer, is slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer, slow down with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(computer, slow down with age)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(computer, slow down with age)